In 26 of the 36 states whose rules we read, a private well must be at least 50 feet from the septic tank. The drainfield distance varies more: 100 feet is the most common figure (23 states, a few of them only for certain wells), several states set 50 to 75 feet, and South Dakota and Rhode Island set 150 feet where the well is shallow or the soil is coarse (New York's 50% increase for shallow wells has the same effect). Every number below comes from the state's own well-construction or onsite-wastewater rule, with its section and, where the text shows one, its date, and your county can require more.
Short answer. Most state rules put a private well at least 50 feet from a septic tank and 100 feet from the drainfield. Wisconsin allows 25 feet to the tank for newer wells; Alaska, Arizona and California require 100 feet to both.
EPA puts it plainly: "Contamination is less likely the farther apart a well is from a septic system." Less likely is not impossible. If your well is closer than your state's minimum, test it for coliform bacteria and nitrate every year, not every few years. A water test is how you find out whether a septic system is reaching your well; how that happens and which results point to it are in our guide to septic system and well water.
How far should a septic tank be from a well?
A setback (states also say "isolation distance" or "separation distance") is the minimum horizontal distance between a well and a possible source of contamination. Minnesota's rule measures "horizontally from the closest part of the upper termination of the water-supply well casing"; Alaska's measures "nearest edge to nearest edge." Most rules list two septic parts separately:
- The septic tank (and pump chamber, holding tank or treatment unit). EPA describes it as "a buried, water-tight container," and most of the rules we read give it the shorter distance.
- The drainfield (also called the leach field, absorption area, soil treatment area or disposal field). It usually gets the longer distance. EPA says partially treated wastewater from the tank "filters down through the soil and enters the groundwater" there.
Some rules add a third, often larger number for seepage pits, cesspools and dry wells. We list those where the rule does.
Well-to-septic distances by state
We checked the 45 states and territories on WaterListed and could verify 36 from the rule text; the rest are listed after the table. We read each rule's current text on November 4, 2026, on the state's own site or agency publication, the state register, Cornell's Legal Information Institute copy of the state code, or (Ohio) an Internet Archive capture of the official page dated April 21, 2026. Distances are in feet from a private (household) well. Where a state's well rule and septic rule both set a distance, we name both or the one written for private wells.
Local rules may be stricter. Counties, health districts and towns can add distances on top of these. Kansas's rule says well locations "shall be approved by municipal and county governments"; Tennessee's notes that "local conditions may require increased distances." Check with your county health department before you drill, build or buy.
| State | Septic tank (ft) | Drainfield (ft) | Seepage pit, cesspool, dry well (ft) | Rule (section, date) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 50 | 100 | Not listed | ADPH Rule 420-3-1-.65, Table 4 (eff. Feb. 13, 2023) | Footnote 6: 50 ft from the field for large-flow developments recorded before Oct. 18, 1978 and lots established before March 18, 1982. |
| Alaska | 100 | 100 | Not listed | 18 AAC 72.100(a)(1) (eff. Oct. 1, 2023) | Applies "unless the department has approved a lesser" distance. |
| Arizona | 100 | 100 | Not listed | A.A.C. R18-9-A312(C) (amended eff. June 19, 2023) | Measured to the whole facility, including its reserve area. |
| California | 100 | 100 | 150 | DWR Water Well Standards (Bulletin 74-81/74-90), Part II, Section 8 | Statewide well standard, applied by the local "enforcing agency." |
| Colorado | 50 | 100 | 100 | 5 CCR 1002-43.7, Table 7-1 (amended eff. Apr. 30, 2025) | Pit privy 100 ft. A variance must come from the state well-construction board. |
| Florida | 75 | 75 | Not listed | F.A.C. 62-6.005(1)(a) (amended eff. June 21, 2022) | Applies to systems built after the rule took effect. |
| Georgia | 50 | 100 | Not listed | Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. 511-3-1-.05(2) and -.07(3) (eff. Jan. 9, 2014) | Tanks go "downgrade from wells or springs if physically possible." |
| Idaho | 50 | 100 | Not listed | IDAPA 37.03.09.025 well construction (eff. Mar. 18, 2022) | 300 ft from a drainfield over 2,500 gal/day. |
| Illinois | 50 | 75 | 150 (cesspool); 100 (leaching pit) | 77 Ill. Adm. Code 920, Table C (amended eff. Mar. 2, 2015) | Distances are "for clay and loam soils." |
| Indiana | 50 | 50 | Not listed | 410 IAC 6-8.3-57, Table I (readopted filed Nov. 14, 2024) | Doubled in some high-loading-rate soils (see below). |
| Iowa | 50 | 100 | Not listed | 567 IAC 60.2(2)"c", Table I (IAC 5/14/25) | Row reads "New or existing private well - deep or shallow." |
| Kansas | 50 | 50 | 50 | K.A.R. 28-30-8(a) (amended May 1, 1987) | "50 feet or more as determined by the department." |
| Kentucky | 50 | 70 | Not listed | 902 KAR 10:085, Section 8, Table 7 (cert. eff. Aug. 10, 2023) | 70 ft is measured from the trench or bed side wall. |
| Louisiana | 50 | 100 (may be 50 for a private well) | 100 (may be 50 for a private well) | LAC 51:XII.169.D, Table (LAC February 2026) | Footnote: "For a private water well this distance may be reduced to 50 feet." |
| Maine | 60 | 100 | Not listed | 10-144 CMR ch. 232, §§ 4-400.2 and 400.4 | Bedrock wells can go to 60 ft from the field with 90 ft of casing. |
| Maryland | Not listed separately | 100 (unconfined aquifer); 50 (confined) | Not listed | COMAR 26.04.04.04B(2) (amended eff. Jan. 15, 2015) | Tank not named; rule covers "identifiable sources of contamination." |
| Massachusetts | 50 | 100 | Not listed | 310 CMR 15.211 (Title 5; amended eff. July 7, 2023) | Irrigation wells: 10 ft and 25 ft. |
| Michigan | 50 | 50 | 50 | Mich. Admin. Code R 325.1622(1)(d) (1994 AACS) | The health officer may raise or lower distances (R 325.1613). |
| Minnesota | 50 | 50 | 75 | Minn. R. 4725.4450 (published Jan. 30, 2024) | "Sensitive" wells: drainfield 100 ft, seepage pit or dry well 150 ft. |
| Montana | 50 | 100 | Not listed | ARM 17.36.918, Table 1 (on-site systems) and ARM 17.36.323, Table 2 (subdivisions) (both amended eff. Dec. 23, 2023) | DEQ rules for on-site systems and subdivisions. |
| Nebraska | 50 | 100 | 100 (privy, cesspool) | 178 NAC 12-003, Chart 1 | Closer only with written Department approval. |
| New Mexico | 50 | 100 | 100 | 20.7.3.302 NMAC, Table 302.1 (amended eff. Sept. 15, 2014) | Applies "to any part" of the system. |
| New York | 50 | 100 | 150 | 10 NYCRR Appendix 75-A.4(b), Table 2 (eff. Mar. 16, 2016) | 200 ft if uphill in the drainage path; +50% for shallow wells. |
| North Carolina | 50 | 50 | 100 (cesspools, privies) | 15A NCAC 02C .0107(a)(2) (readopted eff. June 15, 2020); 18E .0601 (eff. Jan. 1, 2024) | Single-family home; 100 ft for a saprolite system. |
| Ohio | 50 | 50 | 100 (leaching pit or drywell) | OAC 3701-28-07, Table 1 (eff. Jan. 1, 2020) | "Any component" of a sewage treatment system. |
| Oregon | 50 | 100 | 100 | OAR 690-210-0030(1) (amended eff. Sept. 6, 2016; Cornell LII copy) | Water Resources Department well rule. |
| Pennsylvania | 50 | 100 | Not listed | 25 Pa. Code § 73.13(b)-(c) (adopted 1983; Code current through Sept. 5, 2026) | Spray field 100 ft. |
| Rhode Island | 75 | 100 | Not listed | 250-RICR-150-10-6, § 6.23(E) | Under 1,000 gal/day; 150 ft in coarse soils. |
| South Carolina | 75 | 75 | Not listed | S.C. Code Regs. 61-56.200 (amended eff. May 28, 2021) | "No part of the system, excluding solid pipes." |
| South Dakota | 50 (well over 100 ft deep); 75 (under 100 ft) | 100 (deep well); 150 (shallow) | Same as field | ARSD 74:53:01:19, Table 1 (eff. July 1, 1987) | Depth of the well sets the distance. |
| Tennessee | 50 | 50 | Not listed | Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0400-48-01-.11(1) (eff. Sept. 18, 2013) | Row reads "Water Supply." |
| Texas | 50 | 100 | Not listed | 16 TAC § 76.100(a) (amended eff. Apr. 1, 2018) | Privies 150 ft. Field distance can drop to 50 ft for a cemented well, not over the Edwards Aquifer. |
| Virginia | 50 | 50 (Class IIIA/B well); 100 (Class IIIC) | Not listed | 12VAC5-630-380, Table 1 (amended eff. Nov. 6, 2024) | Depends on casing depth (see below). |
| Washington | 50 | 100 | Not listed | WAC 173-160-171 (eff. Jan. 19, 2009); WAC 246-272A-0210 (eff. Apr. 1, 2025) | Health officer may allow 75 ft to the drainfield. |
| Wisconsin | 25 | 50 | Not listed | NR 812.08(4), Table A (wells built after July 1, 2020), per DNR PUB-DG-102 (March 2026) | Older wells: NR 812.42, Table E. |
| Wyoming | 50 | 100 | Not listed | WDEQ Water Quality Rules ch. 25, § 7, Table 4 (amended eff. June 29, 2018) | Row reads "Wells (includes neighboring wells)." |
Not verified (9): Connecticut, Hawaii, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico and West Virginia, plus a single figure for Vermont. For the seven states, we could not open a current official text that states the well distance: the official site blocked or timed out, the document link was dead, the sections we could open did not state a well distance, the table was published only as an image, or the version we found had been replaced (West Virginia's individual sewage rule is marked "Effective until 7/1/2025"). We did not research Puerto Rico's rules. Vermont's rules (amended November 6, 2023) use an "isolation zone" (Table 9-6) instead of one number for tanks and leachfields near a potable water source. For these places, ask the state or county health department.
Your state's certified labs, and any state testing rules we found, are on your state's well rules and labs page.
Why the distance matters: soil, depth and well construction
A setback buys the soil time to treat effluent before it reaches the water your well draws. EPA says filtering wastewater through soil "removes most bacteria and viruses (also known as pathogens) and some nutrients," but "it cannot remove all of them," naming medicines and some cleaning products. EPA also notes that household wastewater "contains harmful bacteria, viruses, and nutrients." That is why the tests for septic influence on a well are coliform bacteria and nitrate, a nutrient (see our nitrate test guide).
EPA lists what raises the risk: a well "at a shallow depth and in permeable soil," a well "downgradient of the septic system," "many homes on septic systems near the well," and poor construction or maintenance of either system. What lowers it: more distance, a deeper well "in bedrock or below a defined layer of silt or clay," and regular pumping and service. EPA adds that if your soil "is sandy, or porous, you may want to place your well farther away than the minimum required distance."
California's well standards say it more bluntly: "No set separation distance is adequate and reasonable for all conditions." Illinois's well code lists what a safe distance depends on: the source, "types of geologic formations present, depth to the aquifer, direction of groundwater flow," the effect of pumping, and flooding. Several states write those factors straight into the number:
| Condition | State and rule | Effect on the minimum |
|---|---|---|
| Shallow well | South Dakota, ARSD 74:53:01:19 | Wells under 100 ft deep: 75 ft to the tank and 150 ft to the absorption field, instead of 50 and 100 |
| Water enters the well less than 50 ft below grade | New York, Appendix 75-A, Table 2, note (g) | Well distances "increased by 50%" |
| "Sensitive" well: less than 50 ft of watertight casing and not cased through 10 ft of a confining layer | Minnesota, Minn. R. 4725.4450 | Distances "are doubled" for sources directly entering the soil: drainfield 100 ft, seepage pit or dry well 150 ft |
| Casing depth of a bedrock well | Maine, 10-144 CMR ch. 232, Table 400.1 | Disposal-field setback may drop from 100 ft to 90, 80, 70 or 60 ft with 40, 55, 70 or 90 ft of casing |
| Well class (casing depth) | Virginia, 12VAC5-630-380 | Drainfield 50 ft for Class IIIA/IIIB wells (cased to 100 or 50 ft); 100 ft for Class IIIC (cased to 20 ft) |
| Confined vs unconfined aquifer | Maryland, COMAR 26.04.04.04 | 100 ft (unconfined) or 50 ft (confined) to sewage disposal areas |
| Septic system uphill, in the drainage path to the well | New York, Table 2, note (a) | At least 200 ft |
| Coarse (Category 1) soils | Rhode Island, § 6.23(E) | Leachfield 150 ft instead of 100 |
| Soil layers within 34 inches of the surface with a high loading rate (over 0.75 gal/day/sq ft) | Indiana, 410 IAC 6-8.3-57 | Absorption-field distances "doubled" unless the design overcomes the hazard |
Show the numbers
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Septic tank, well over 100 ft deep | 50 feet | |
| Septic tank, well under 100 ft deep | 75 feet | |
| Absorption field, well over 100 ft deep | 100 feet | |
| Absorption field, well under 100 ft deep | 150 feet |
Minimum horizontal distance from a well to on-site wastewater components, ARSD 74:53:01:19, Table 1 (column A: wells over 100 feet deep; column B: wells less than 100 feet deep, springs or water suction lines). Seepage pits share the absorption-field row. Local rules may be stricter. Source: South Dakota Administrative Rules, ARSD 74:53:01:19, Distance between on-site wastewater system components and pertinent ground features, Table 1 (source note: effective July 18, 1985; July 1, 1987; transferred July 1, 1996), accessed 2026-11-04.
The federal rule for new FHA homes, 24 CFR 200.926d, has the same logic in a footnote: the drainfield and seepage-pit distance "may be increased in creviced limestone and permeable strata of gravel and sand" and reduced to 50 feet "only where the ground surface is effectively separated from the water bearing formation by an extensive, continuous and impervious strata of clay, hardpan, or rock."
The practical reading: a 100-foot drainfield distance is a floor written for average ground. Over sand, gravel or fractured limestone, or with a shallow or short-cased well, the margin is thinner than the number suggests. The well log usually tells you depth and casing; see how to find well and septic records.
Seepage pits, cesspools and dry wells
Where a rule names these, the distance is usually as large as the drainfield's or larger:
- 150 ft: New York (seepage pit), California (cesspool or seepage pit), Illinois (cesspool), and Minnesota for a sensitive well.
- 100 ft: Ohio (a leaching pit or drywell "that has not been properly abandoned"), Illinois (leaching pit), Colorado and New Mexico (seepage pit), and Nebraska (cesspool).
- 75 ft: Minnesota (cesspool, seepage pit, leaching pit or dry well).
- 50 ft: Michigan (seepage pit, dry well, cesspool) and Kansas (seepage pit), which put them in the same list as the tank.
Kentucky's rule prohibits seepage pits, cesspools and dry wells except as its Section 13 allows. New York's appendix says seepage pits "shall not be used" where soil and site conditions are adequate for absorption trenches. The new-construction table in 24 CFR 200.926d lists a seepage pit at 100 ft and a dry well at 50 ft.
Show the numbers
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| House sewer, cast iron with watertight joints | 25 feet | |
| Septic tank | 50 feet | |
| Effluent line to distribution box | 50 feet | |
| Distribution box | 100 feet | |
| Absorption field | 100 feet | |
| Seepage pit | 150 feet |
10 NYCRR Appendix 75-A.4(b), Table 2, well or suction line column (Appendix effective March 16, 2016). Note (a): at least 200 feet when the system is upgrade and in the direct path of surface drainage to the well. Note (g): well distances increase by 50% when aquifer water enters the well less than 50 feet below grade. Local rules may be stricter. Source: New York State Department of Health, 10 NYCRR Appendix 75-A, Wastewater Treatment Standards - Individual Household Systems, Table 2 (effective March 16, 2016), accessed 2026-11-04.
Private wells vs public wells
Rules that list both usually set larger distances for a public water supply well. Indiana's table gives 50 ft from a private well and 200 ft from a public well to both the tank and the absorption field. Florida: 75 ft for a private potable well; 100 or 200 ft for a public drinking water well, depending on the sewage flow of the facility it serves. Wyoming: 50 and 100 ft for wells, 100 and 200 ft for a public water supply well. If a neighbor's well serves a business or a small water system, a larger number may apply; ask the health department.
Neighbors' wells count too. Wyoming's table row reads "Wells (includes neighboring wells)." Pennsylvania's exemption for a well on the same lot does not cover "any wells on any other lot, regardless of the ownership of that lot." EPA tells owners to keep the well at the right distance "from your and your neighbor's system."
Existing wells vs new construction
Setback rules are written for the moment something is built. They apply when a new well is drilled or a new septic system is permitted, and most don't order an existing, legally built well or septic system to move. How states handle older layouts:
- New wells meet today's number. Minnesota: the minimum "must be maintained between a new well and a contamination source, even if the contamination source is no longer in use" (unless the source and contaminated soil have been removed). Maine's well-location chapter governs "new water supply wells."
- Older wells keep the rule they were built under. Wisconsin's NR 812.42 says a well "must comply with the requirements in effect at the time the well was constructed" or the current rule, "whichever is less restrictive." A contamination source added later must meet the rule in force when it was installed.
- Owners must keep the distance. Michigan (R 325.1622(4)) and Ohio (3701-28-07(N)) make the well owner responsible for maintaining isolation distances on property the owner controls.
- Septic repairs on small lots. Colorado: on a lot too small for the table, "a repaired OWTS must not be closer to setback features than the existing OWTS." Pennsylvania (25 Pa. Code § 72.33) lets the local agency waive the distance to a well on the same lot if a groundwater study shows no threat. Washington lets the local health officer allow 75 ft to a non-public well under set conditions.
- When nothing fits. Ohio says a new private water system that can't meet every distance must keep "the greatest practical distances," with sewage systems first in line. Nebraska allows closer siting only with prior written approval.
- A well drilled too close. New Mexico's rule: if a private well was drilled too close to an existing liquid waste system, the department sends both owners a certified letter describing "the potential hazards" and stops applying the well setback to that system, as long as it stays compliant and unmodified.
Unused wells are a contamination source in their own right: Minnesota lists an "unused, unsealed well or boring" at 50 ft. See old water well on your property.
FHA, VA and USDA distances
For an existing home, HUD Handbook 4000.1 (revised August 12, 2026) still prints FHA's table: 10 ft to the property line, 50 ft to a septic tank, 100 ft to a drain field, or 75 ft "if allowed by local authority." But FHA INFO 2026-17 (July 27, 2026) waives those distances for existing construction when "the property meets the distance requirements of the local jurisdiction" and "acceptable water testing results are documented by the mortgagee." The waiver does not apply to new construction, which keeps the 24 CFR 200.926d table (50 ft to a septic tank, 100 ft to an absorption field or seepage pit). Ask your lender which rule it applies.
VA and USDA handle distances differently; the full comparison is in FHA well and septic distance requirements. For an inspector's check of the setbacks at a sale, see well and septic inspection.
What to do if your well is too close
Start with a measurement and a water test, not a new well.
- Measure edge to edge. Find the tank lid and the drainfield's outer edge (the septic permit's as-built drawing shows them) and measure horizontally to the well casing. Compare with your state row above and ask the county what local rule applies.
- Test now. Order coliform bacteria (with E. coli) and nitrate from a state-certified lab. EPA already advises testing a private well "annually for total coliform bacteria, nitrates, total dissolved solids, and pH levels." Find a lab for nitrate or bacteria.
- Then test every year, without gaps. One clean result describes one day. A yearly series shows whether nitrate is creeping up. Our how often to test well water guide lists the extra triggers, such as flooding or a septic repair.
- Check the wellhead. EPA warns that surfacing wastewater "may contaminate your drinking water through an unsecured well cap or cracks in the well casing."
- Act on the result. Bacteria: see coliform bacteria and how to shock chlorinate a well. Rising nitrate: see the nitrate guide and talk to the health department about the well and the septic system before spending on either.
| Your situation | What the rules say | What to test |
|---|---|---|
| Existing well and septic, both legal when built, closer than today's minimum | Usually no duty to move either (Wisconsin: the rule in effect when the well was built) | Coliform with E. coli and nitrate every year; keep every report |
| Closer than the minimum and the well is shallow or short-cased | Several states would require more distance for this well (Minnesota doubles it; New York adds 50%) | Same yearly tests, plus a retest after any flood, backup or septic repair |
| Replacing a failed septic system | Repair rules: not closer than the old system (Colorado); local waivers with a groundwater study (Pennsylvania) | Test before the work and again after it |
| Drilling a new well | Must meet the current minimum (Minnesota) | A first test once the new well has been disinfected |
| Buying with an FHA loan | Existing homes: the local distance plus an acceptable water test (INFO 2026-17) | The lender's list, sampled by a disinterested third party |
Worked example. A Minnesota well sits 70 ft from the drainfield. The well record shows 35 ft of casing and no clay layer. Less than 50 ft of casing and no confining layer make it a "sensitive" well under Minn. R. 4725.4450, so the drainfield minimum would be 100 ft, not 50. Whether anything has to change is a question for MDH or the county. The testing plan doesn't wait for that answer: this is the second row of the table, so test coliform and nitrate every year and again after any septic work. The first nitrate result becomes the baseline; if later results climb, ask the county health department to look at the septic system. Minnesota buyers can start at nitrate testing in Minnesota.
A new well needs its own first test after disinfection; the steps are in our guide to a new well's cost and first test.
Questions people ask
How far does a septic tank have to be from a well?
How far should a drain field be from a well?
Can a well be closer than 50 feet to a septic system?
Do setback rules apply to my existing well?
What are FHA's well and septic distance requirements?
Does my neighbor's septic system count?
What should I test if my well is too close to the septic?
- U.S. EPA, Septic Systems and Drinking Water (last updated July 29, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- U.S. EPA, Protect Your Home's Water (last updated February 26, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Handbook 4000.1, FHA Single Family Housing Policy Handbook (Update 18, last revised August 12, 2026), Individual Water Supply System table for Existing Construction, p. 187-188 (read from the Internet Archive capture of October 11, 2026; hud.gov blocks direct access) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, FHA INFO Messages: FHA INFO 2026-17, FHA Issues Waiver to Well Water Distance Requirements for Existing Construction (July 27, 2026) (read from the Internet Archive capture of October 10, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- eCFR, 24 CFR 200.926d Construction requirements, (f)(3)(iv) distance table and footnotes (current version) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Alabama Department of Public Health, Chapter 420-3-1 Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal, Rule 420-3-1-.65 and Table 4 (revised February 13, 2023), Alabama Administrative Code (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Alaska, 18 AAC 72.100 Separation distance requirements for private water systems (eff. October 1, 2023), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Arizona, A.A.C. R18-9-A312 Facility Design for Type 4 On-site Wastewater Treatment Facilities, subsection C (amended eff. June 19, 2023), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- California Department of Water Resources, Water Well Standards (Bulletins 74-81 and 74-90), Part II, Section 8, Well Location with Respect to Contaminants and Pollutants (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Colorado, 5 CCR 1002-43.7 Minimum Distances between Components of an On-site Wastewater Treatment System and Physical Features, Table 7-1 (amended eff. April 30, 2025), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Florida, F.A.C. 62-6.005 Location and Installation (amended eff. June 21, 2022), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Georgia, Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. 511-3-1-.05 Septic Tanks (eff. January 9, 2014), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Georgia, Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. 511-3-1-.07 Absorption Fields (eff. January 9, 2014), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Idaho, IDAPA 37.03.09.025 Construction of Cold Water Wells (eff. March 18, 2022), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Illinois, 77 Ill. Adm. Code 920, Table C (amended eff. March 2, 2015), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Illinois, 77 Ill. Adm. Code 920.50 Location (amended eff. November 25, 2013), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Indiana, 410 IAC 6-8.3-57 Separation distances, Table I (readopted filed November 14, 2024), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Iowa Administrative Code, 567 Chapter 60, 60.2(2)c, Table I: Wastewater Separation Distances (IAC 5/14/25) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Kansas, K.A.R. 28-30-8 (amended May 1, 1987), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Kentucky Legislative Research Commission, 902 KAR 10:085 Kentucky on-site sewage disposal systems, Section 8, Table 7 (Cert. eff. August 10, 2023) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Louisiana Department of Health, Louisiana Administrative Code Title 51, Part XII Water Supplies, §169.D Table 169.D.1.a.ii (LAC February 2026) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Maine, 10-144 C.M.R. ch. 232, § 4-400.0 Water Well Location, Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Maryland, COMAR 26.04.04.04 Review and Approval of an Application for a Well Construction Permit (amended eff. January 15, 2015), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Massachusetts, 310 CMR 15.211 Minimum Setback Distances (amended eff. July 7, 2023), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Michigan, Mich. Admin. Code R 325.1622 (1979 AC; 1994 AACS), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Minnesota Revisor of Statutes, Minnesota Rules 4725.4450 Isolation distances (published electronically January 30, 2024) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Minnesota Department of Health, Isolation Distances From a Water-Supply Well (last updated October 2, 2024) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Montana, ARM 17.36.918 Horizontal setbacks, floodplains, Table 1 (amended eff. December 23, 2023), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Montana, ARM 17.36.323 Setbacks, Table 2 (amended eff. December 23, 2023), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Nebraska, 178 NAC ch. 12, § 003 General Requirements, Charts 1 and 2, Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- New Mexico, 20.7.3.302 NMAC Standards; Setback Requirements, Table 302.1 (amended eff. September 15, 2014), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- New York State Department of Health, 10 NYCRR Appendix 75-A Wastewater Treatment Standards - Individual Household Systems (effective March 16, 2016), 75-A.4(b) Table 2 and 75-A.8(h) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- North Carolina, 15A NCAC 02C .0107 Standards of Construction: Water Supply Wells (readopted eff. June 15, 2020), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- North Carolina, 15A NCAC 18E .0601 Location of Wastewater Systems, Table IX (eff. January 1, 2024), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Ohio Administrative Code, Rule 3701-28-07 Location, operation, and maintenance of private water systems (effective January 1, 2020) (codes.ohio.gov did not connect; read from the Internet Archive capture of April 21, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Oregon, OAR 690-210-0030 Placement of Water Supply Wells (amended eff. Sept. 6, 2016), Cornell LII copy (the Secretary of State site did not connect) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Pennsylvania Code, 25 Pa. Code § 73.13 Minimum horizontal isolation distances (Code current through 56 Pa.B. 6006, September 5, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Pennsylvania Code, 25 Pa. Code § 72.33 Well isolation distance exemption (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Rhode Island Department of State, 250-RICR-150-10-6 Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems, § 6.23(E) Minimum Setback Distances from Drinking Water Wells (accessed 2026-11-04)
- South Carolina, S.C. Code Regs. 61-56.200 Minimum Site Conditions for Onsite Wastewater Systems (amended eff. May 28, 2021), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- South Dakota Legislature, ARSD 74:53:01:19 Distance between on-site wastewater system components and pertinent ground features (eff. July 1, 1987) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Tennessee, Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0400-48-01-.11 (eff. September 18, 2013), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Texas, 16 TAC § 76.100 Technical Requirements - Locations and Standards of Completion for Wells (amended eff. April 1, 2018), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, Well Drilling and Pump Installing Technical Guidance (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Virginia Administrative Code, 12VAC5-630-380 Well location, Table 1 (amended eff. November 6, 2024) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Virginia Administrative Code, 12VAC5-630-410 Construction; general (casing and grouting depths by well class) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Washington, WAC 173-160-171 What are the requirements for the location of the well site? (effective January 19, 2009) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Washington, WAC 246-272A-0210 Location, Table IV (effective April 1, 2025) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Water Well, Reservoir and Spring Location, PUB-DG-102 (March 2026), reproducing NR 812.08(4) Table A and NR 812.42(1)(a) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Wyoming, 020-25 Wyo. Code R. § 25-7 (Chapter 25, Section 7), Table 4 (amended eff. June 29, 2018), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Vermont, 12-001 Code Vt. R. 12-033-001-X Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, § 1-912 and Table 9-3 (amended November 6, 2023), Cornell LII (accessed 2026-11-04)
- West Virginia, W. Va. Code R. § 64-47-6 [Effective until 7/1/2025] Individual Sewage Systems, Cornell LII (superseded; cited only for its effective-until date) (accessed 2026-11-04)