The short answer: "salt" in well water is usually three separate lab results: sodium, chloride and sulfate. Table salt dissolves into sodium and chloride; sulfate is a different mineral, which Minnesota's health department describes as bitter. None of the three has an enforceable federal limit on a private well. EPA's guidelines are 250 mg/L for chloride and for sulfate (taste), 30 to 60 mg/L for sodium (taste), 20 mg/L of sodium for people on a 500 mg/day sodium-restricted diet, and a health-based 500 mg/L for sulfate's laxative effect.
The New York State Department of Health (Salt and Drinking Water, Internet Archive copy of October 31, 2025) says sodium and chloride "occur naturally in groundwater, but levels can increase from road salt, water softeners, natural salt deposits, sewage and fertilizers." This page puts all three ions in one place: EPA's exact wording, how each gets into a well, what the trend data show, which test to order and what each result means.
Low-sodium diet, or a baby on formula? EPA's 2003 sodium advisory says people "under treatment for sodium-sensitive hypertension should consult with their health care provider regarding sodium levels in their drinking water." Its sulfate advisory says water high in sulfate or total dissolved solids "should not be used in the preparation of powdered infant formula or nutritional supplements," and the Minnesota Department of Health advises water with "a sulfate level lower than 500 milligrams per liter (mg/L) to make infant formula." Take the report to your doctor or pediatrician.
Salt in well water: three ions, five numbers
All five numbers are written for public water systems. EPA's secondary standards page (updated May 26, 2026) says "EPA does not enforce" its secondary levels, and each 2003 advisory says "A Drinking Water Advisory is not an enforceable standard for action." On a private well they are yardsticks.
| Ion | EPA number | Kind of number | EPA's wording |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium | 20 mg/L | Guidance level, 2003 advisory | "For individuals on a very low sodium diet (500 mg/day), EPA recommends that drinking-water sodium not exceed 20 mg/L." |
| Sodium | 30 to 60 mg/L | Taste, 2003 advisory | "EPA recommends that sodium concentrations in drinking water not exceed 30 to 60 mg/L, a threshold for taste-sensitive segments of the population." |
| Chloride | 250 mg/L | Secondary standard (SMCL) | Effect above it: "salty taste." Also among "Standards related to corrosion and staining." |
| Sulfate | 250 mg/L | Secondary standard (SMCL) | Effect above it: "salty taste." |
| Sulfate | 500 mg/L | Health-based, 2003 advisory | "A health-based advisory for acute effects (absence of laxative effects) of 500 mg of sulfate/L is recommended." |
The advisories are EPA 822-R-03-006 (sodium) and EPA 822-R-03-007 (sulfate), both February 2003 and both still posted on EPA's sodium and sulfate pages (updated June 10, 2026). EPA's 2018 standards and health advisories tables carry the same values. For these ions, 1 mg/L equals 1 ppm.
Sodium in well water: the 20 mg/L advisory and the 30 to 60 mg/L taste range
The two sodium numbers answer different questions. The 30 to 60 mg/L range is about taste: EPA says water in it "is unlikely to be perceived as salty by most individuals and would contribute only 2.5% to 5% of the dietary goal if tap water consumption is 2 L/day." People differ a lot. EPA: the average taste threshold "differs substantially among individuals and ranges from about 30 mg/L to 460 mg/L."
The 20 mg/L number is for one group. EPA: "This value was developed for those individuals restricted to a total sodium intake of 500 mg/day and should not be extrapolated to the entire population." For everyone else, "Drinking water does not play a significant role in sodium exposure for most individuals."
States and extension services use their own lines:
- Wisconsin (DHS, revised April 22, 2021) recommends "a threshold of 20 milligrams per liter (mg/L) for people that are on a low sodium or 'no salt' diet," and bottled water for drinking in those cases.
- New York: agencies "recommend sodium levels in water not exceed 20 milligrams per liter (mg/L) for people on very low sodium diets and 270 mg/L for people on moderately restricted sodium diets."
- Massachusetts: UMass Extension (Sodium Chloride in Private Drinking Water Wells, last updated June 1, 2007; Internet Archive copy of March 11, 2026) says "about 99 percent of the daily salt intake is from food," and: "Consult your physician if your drinking water exceeds 20 milligrams per liter of sodium."
- Connecticut: the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) road salt FAQ (Internet Archive copy of July 9, 2026) says sodium "exceeding 100 mg/L can make a substantial contribution to dietary sodium for those on a sodium-restricted diet."
So 45 mg/L is above EPA's 20 mg/L guidance level, inside its taste range and well under Connecticut's 100. Whether it matters depends on who drinks it, which is a doctor's question.
Softeners add sodium to the water you drink
Penn State Extension (updated September 8, 2025): "The exchange of hardness minerals for sodium adds 7.5 milligrams per quart for each gpg of hardness removed." At 10 grains per gallon that is roughly 80 mg/L (our arithmetic). EPA's advisory says domestic softeners "can increase sodium levels to more than 300 mg/L in drinking water." UMass: if someone in the house is on a low-salt diet, "arrange to test the treated tap water for sodium levels." The hard water guide has the full arithmetic and water softener vs. water filter the workarounds.
Chloride in well water: the 250 mg/L taste line and corrosion
Chloride is the "salty" in salty water. The smell, taste and stains guide sorts a salty taste from metallic or bitter ones. UMass: above "about 250 milligrams per liter" it will "usually produce a noticeable taste." It isn't the health worry; Connecticut DEEP says "Chlorides do not present a direct health risk to humans."
Corrosion is. DEEP: elevated chlorides "(>250 mg/L) increase the corrosivity of water, which can leach harmful metals (such as lead, copper, and manganese) from household plumbing and soils into the water." New York says high chloride "could shorten the life of plumbing, hot water heaters and appliances, and increase the metal content of the water." USGS's Vermont domestic-well report (Open-File Report 2019-1148, April 2020) gives a mechanism: rising chloride "can increase the chloride-to-sulfate (Cl/SO4) mass ratio ..., which can raise the potential for water to become more corrosive and to leach lead and copper from plumbing." So a high chloride result is a reason for a first-draw test; the copper and lead pages explain it.
Rising chloride can also mean sewage. UMass: "An increase in chloride content in well water may indicate possible pollution from sewage sources, particularly if the normal chloride content in surrounding wells is known to be low. In this case, also have your water tested for bacteria."
Sulfate in well water: bitter taste, laxative effect and infant formula
Sulfate isn't part of table salt and usually comes from rock. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH, updated August 1, 2025): "Sulfate occurs naturally in most of Minnesota's groundwater," and "High levels of sulfate (sometimes above 1000 mg/L) are more common in the southwestern areas of Minnesota." Penn State (updated May 29, 2025) adds "nearby coal mining." EPA's table says "salty taste"; MDH says sulfate above 250 mg/L "may make the water taste bitter or like medicine."
EPA's sulfate advisory explains the 500 mg/L number:
- It "depends on the absence of other osmotically active materials in drinking water, which could lower the sulfate level associated with a laxative effect."
- Without them, "the laxative effects are unlikely to be observed at concentrations up to about 1,000 mg/L sulfate."
- "In the case of sulfate, adults appear to adapt within 1 or 2 weeks ... Infants, however, may be more sensitive."
The first point matters on a well, where high-sulfate water often carries other minerals. EPA: where water has high total dissolved solids, "laxative-like effects may occur if the water is mixed with concentrated infant formula or a powdered nutritional supplement," and "an alternate low-mineral-content water source is advised." EPA's July 2003 regulatory support document names the sensitive groups: "formula-fed infants, the elderly or invalids who use powdered nutritional supplements, and visitors who are not acclimated to high sulfate concentrations in drinking water." Sulfate also feeds the rotten-egg smell; see how to remove sulfur smell from well water.
Where salt in well water comes from
EPA's sodium advisory: "Sodium is present in road deicing chemicals, in water treatment chemicals, in domestic water softeners, and in sewage effluents." Groundwater runs higher "especially in areas with an abundance of sodium mineral deposits or in areas with sea or estuarine water intrusions." Each source leaves a different pattern.
| Source | Clues | Which ions | Who says so |
|---|---|---|---|
| Road salt and salt storage | Near a paved road or salt pile; shallow casing or bedrock near the surface; worse after snowmelt | Sodium and chloride together | USGS; Connecticut DEEP; Wisconsin DNR |
| Softener brine discharge | Backwash discharged near the well, or a softener overloading the septic system | Chloride and sodium in the raw water | Connecticut DEEP; Wisconsin DNR |
| Softened water itself | Sodium high at a softened tap, normal at an untreated one | Sodium (or potassium) | Penn State; UMass |
| Seawater intrusion | Coastal aquifer; heavy pumping nearby | Sodium and chloride | USGS; EPA |
| Natural salt in rock | Marine sediments, salt or gypsum deposits, certain bedrock | Any of the three | USGS; Wisconsin DNR; MDH |
| Sewage or septic | Chloride rising where neighbors' wells are low | Chloride | UMass; New York |
| Oil and gas brine | Drilling operations nearby | Chloride, sodium, barium, strontium | EPA |
Road salt and softener discharge
Connecticut DEEP: "Rock salt, sodium chloride (NaCl), is the most common salt used in Connecticut for the removal of snow and ice." New Hampshire's environmental agency wrote in a February 9, 2022 article (Internet Archive copy) that road salt "has been the number one contributor to chloride and sodium contamination in groundwater," and "water softeners are another growing source."
Distance shows up in the Vermont data: chloride results from "approximately 4,319 (or 4 percent) of private wells in Vermont," 2011 to 2018. Wells closer to a paved road "had substantially higher concentrations of chloride than wells farther away and were also five times more likely to exceed the SMCL." Most wells were fine: more than half were below the 5 mg/L reporting level and about 1 percent were above 250 mg/L, "with a maximum of 3,262 mg/L."
Construction matters too. The Wisconsin DNR's "My Water Tastes Salty" sheet asks: "Is bedrock close to the ground surface in your area or is the casing pipe in your well shallow?" It also lists a "Malfunctioning Water Softener overloading your septic system, resulting in excess chloride in the groundwater." Connecticut DEEP: "If a well is near the brine backwash discharge location, it can potentially introduce salt into the drinking water." Switching to potassium chloride cuts sodium in the treated water, but the backwash still sends "a brine solution out of the home."
Seawater and natural salt
USGS's saltwater intrusion page: "Saltwater intrusion has occurred to some degree in many of the coastal aquifers of the United States," and in extreme cases it "can result in the abandonment of wells." Its brackish groundwater assessment: "Pumping wells near the coast can further increase flow of seawater into fresh aquifers." EPA's private-well table (updated February 26, 2026) pairs "Salty taste and seawater, or a heavily salted roadway nearby" with "Chloride, total dissolved solids, sodium."
Some salt is old. The same USGS assessment: "Salt deposits, such as halite or gypsum, are found in many sedimentary basins in the United States and are highly soluble," and connate water is water "trapped in the sediments as they were deposited." Wisconsin DNR lists "Naturally-Occurring Salt" for wells in "Precambrian (granite) rock." UMass notes that natural background levels "are not usually elevated." Our reading: high sodium and chloride beside a salted road points first at the road; a remote well with high sulfate and TDS points at the rock. For drilling brines, see well water testing near fracking.
Is well water getting saltier? What USGS data show
In parts of the country, yes. A 2023 USGS-led study in the Journal of Hydrology (Lindsey and others) used "repeated decadal sampling (once every 10 years) from 1988 to 2021" in "more than 2,200 wells in 25 Principal Aquifers." Sodium, chloride, dissolved solids, sulfate and nitrate showed statistically significant increases more often than other constituents. Chloride increases were large in urban parts of the Northeast and Midcontinent, "where road-deicing salt application rates are 10 to 100 times greater than in other regions of the country," and in the arid West, "where evaporation concentrates solutes in recharge."
New Hampshire has a long state record. A USGS fact sheet (FS 2013-3011, February 2013) pooled public and private well data from 1960 through 2011: "Median chloride concentrations were at least 1½ times higher and sodium concentrations at least 3 times higher between 2000–11 than in all previous decades." The share of observations above EPA's 20 mg/L sodium advisory went from 13 percent in the 1970s to 30 percent in the 2000s:
Show the numbers
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 13 % of observations | |
| 1980s | 23 % of observations | |
| 1990s | 23 % of observations | |
| 2000s | 30 % of observations |
Public and private well data pooled from several agencies; not a random sample. The 2000s include 2011. No sodium data for the 1960s. Source: USGS Fact Sheet 2013-3011, Concentrations of Chloride and Sodium in Groundwater in New Hampshire From 1960 Through 2011, Table 1, accessed 2026-11-03.
The high end moved too. The 90th percentile of chloride, which only the saltiest tenth of wells exceeded, was about double in the 2000s what it was in the 1980s and 1990s:
Show the numbers
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 88 mg/L | |
| 1970s | 77 mg/L | |
| 1980s | 60 mg/L | |
| 1990s | 61 mg/L | |
| 2000s | 122 mg/L |
Ten percent of well medians in each decade were higher than this value. The 2000s include 2011. EPA's secondary standard is 250 mg/L. Source: USGS Fact Sheet 2013-3011, Concentrations of Chloride and Sodium in Groundwater in New Hampshire From 1960 Through 2011, Table 1, accessed 2026-11-03.
Two cautions. The share above 250 mg/L chloride didn't rise (3 percent in the 1990s and in the 2000s), so this is ordinary wells creeping up rather than many crossing EPA's 250 mg/L taste line. And the data were "collected to meet wide-ranging objectives," not as a random sample.
For a baseline, Penn State Extension (updated October 13, 2025) gives figures for Pennsylvania wells:
| Test | Penn State: Pennsylvania wells |
|---|---|
| Chloride | "83% of water wells were below 20 mg/L while less than 1% exceed 250 mg/L" |
| Sodium | "64% of water wells were below 20 mg/L. About 6% exceed 100 mg/L" |
| Sulfate | "Average sulfates were less than 20 mg/L. Over 90% of water wells were below 100 mg/L. About 1% exceed 250 mg/L" |
| Total dissolved solids | "75% of wells had TDS levels between 100 and 500 mg/L" |
Which test to order, and when to sample
Ask one of the certified labs for sodium, chloride, sulfate and total dissolved solids together. On a new well, put them on the first water test, so you have a baseline before any road salt or softener changes it. They add up: USGS Circular 1332 (2009) says dissolved solids "include major ions, such as calcium, sodium, bicarbonate, sulfate, and chloride," and found them above the 500 mg/L guideline in 15 percent of domestic wells, most often in the West, Southwest and south-central states. If all you have is a TDS reading, the pH and TDS guide explains it.
Add by situation: first-draw lead and copper if chloride is high; coliform bacteria if chloride is rising (UMass); hardness and a softened-tap sodium if you have a softener; barium and strontium near gas drilling (EPA); hydrogen sulfide if there's a rotten-egg smell.
Timing comes from Connecticut DEEP's salt investigation policy (Internet Archive copy of July 9, 2026; content updated November 5, 2024). Sample before and after any treatment, to show "the raw water quality (before treatment) and the final drinking water quality (after treatment)." And mind the season: "In March and April, snow-melt and thawing soil can flush accumulated winter road salt into groundwater," and "chloride concentrations can also increase when the water table is low in the fall." DEEP's advice is to test in spring or fall.
UMass: "Home test kits may not provide accurate results." Browse labs by state, and confirm all three ions are on the lab's certified list. The sampling guide covers bottles and holding times.
Reading your result: a decision table
Thresholds are the sources' own. For units and report terms, see how to read a well water test report.
| # | Your result | What it means | Sensible next step |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sodium 20 mg/L or less; chloride and sulfate under 250 mg/L | Under every EPA number | Keep it as your baseline. Retest after a softener goes in or the taste changes. |
| 2 | Sodium above 20, up to 60 mg/L | Above EPA's 20 mg/L guidance level; not above the top of its 30 to 60 mg/L taste range | Matters for a very low sodium diet: share it with that person's doctor (EPA, UMass). |
| 3 | Sodium above 60, up to 100 mg/L | Above EPA's taste range; under Connecticut's 100 mg/L line | Same doctor question. With a softener, test a softened and an unsoftened tap (UMass recommends testing the treated tap). |
| 4 | Sodium above 100 mg/L | "A substantial contribution to dietary sodium for those on a sodium-restricted diet" (Connecticut DEEP) | Physician if anyone is on a restricted diet. Find the source. New York and UMass describe a small tap unit as enough for drinking and cooking around this level. |
| 5 | Chloride above 250 mg/L | Above EPA's salty-taste line; more corrosive water (DEEP) | First-draw lead and copper. Retest "periodically to determine if any upward trend exists" (UMass). |
| 6 | Sulfate above 250, up to 500 mg/L | Above EPA's taste guideline; under its health-based advisory | Bitter taste; newcomers may get loose stools, adults usually adapt (EPA, MDH). If TDS is also high, EPA says not to use it for powdered formula; use a low-mineral water and ask the pediatrician. |
| 7 | Sulfate above 500 mg/L | Above EPA's health-based advisory | Not for infant formula (MDH); ask the pediatrician. Reverse osmosis or distillation at the drinking tap (MDH). |
| 8 | Sodium high at a softened tap, normal untreated | The softener adds it | Unsoftened drinking tap or potassium chloride; see softener vs. filter. |
| 9 | Chloride clearly higher than last time | Road salt, softener discharge or sewage | Test bacteria (UMass); resample in spring or fall (DEEP); check the well cap and casing. |
Worked examples: two salty wells
Illustrative numbers, not real results.
House A: Connecticut, drilled well about 50 feet from a road salted all winter; salty taste since March. Untreated tap: sodium 140 mg/L, chloride 310 mg/L, sulfate 24 mg/L, TDS 780 mg/L. That's rows 4 and 5. Sodium and chloride high together beside a road, with low sulfate, fits the road-salt row, and March fits DEEP's snowmelt warning. Plan: first-draw lead and copper; a doctor's view on the sodium if anyone has high blood pressure; a reverse osmosis tap for drinking and cooking; and, since both results pass DEEP's complaint lines, a complaint as described below.
House B: southwestern Minnesota, no road nearby, bitter taste, baby due in June. Sodium 35 mg/L, chloride 12 mg/L, sulfate 640 mg/L, TDS 1,150 mg/L. That's row 7, with the high TDS EPA warns about. Low chloride and MDH's regional pattern point to geology. Plan: another water source below 500 mg/L for formula (MDH), and ask the pediatrician; then reverse osmosis at the kitchen tap. At MDH's 93 to 99 percent removal, 640 mg/L becomes roughly 6 to 45 mg/L (our arithmetic); test the treated water to confirm. The softener won't help: MDH says "Water softeners, carbon filters, and sediment filters do not remove sulfate."
Fixes: what removes sodium, chloride and sulfate
These are dissolved ions, so ordinary filters don't touch them.
| Option | What sources say | Limits |
|---|---|---|
| Reverse osmosis at the drinking tap | Sulfate: "usually removes between 93 and 99 percent" (MDH). Chloride: "Reverse osmosis or distillation systems at individual taps" (Penn State). Sodium: small units make "three to ten gallons of water per day" (UMass). | One tap. New York: "They use a lot of water" and remove "desirable minerals." |
| Distillation | Sulfate: "nearly 100 percent" with proper operation (MDH). Listed for sodium and chloride by UMass. | General note (ours): suited to drinking and cooking volumes. UMass advises weighing "both the initial cost and the operating costs." |
| Anion exchange (sulfate) | MDH: "the most common method of removing large quantities of sulfate," but "not commonly used for individual household water treatment." | Penn State: "chloride concentration may complicate treatment." General note (ours): it exchanges negatively charged ions such as sulfate, so it does not lower sodium. |
| Whole-house reverse osmosis | DEEP: most send "three to four gallons of water to waste for every one gallon of treated water produced." | DEEP: that wastewater "cannot discharge to septic systems." |
| Deeper or new well | Connecticut DOT replaced "approximately two dozen impacted private wells with deeper wells (at least 350 feet deep) with at least 60 feet of steel casing into bedrock" (DEEP). | DEEP: "does not guarantee they will provide clean drinking water." Penn State on chloride: "consider developing new source of water." |
A softener adds sodium rather than removing it. EPA (writing for public systems) calls distillation, reverse osmosis and electrodialysis "fairly expensive technologies." Look for independent certification of the specific reduction claim, and test the treated water afterward. The treatment-by-result guide compares fixes for other results.
If road salt reached your well
Connecticut has a formal route, and it shows what evidence to collect anywhere. DEEP says it "is actively investigating multiple complaints across the state for sodium chloride (salt) impacts in private drinking water wells." Its policy:
- Test at a state certified laboratory, "including sodium and chloride," before and after any treatment.
- File once a report from the past year "indicates chloride >250 mg/L, and/or sodium >100 mg/L."
- Next to a state road or state salt storage, complain to the state Department of Transportation's Environmental Compliance Section or to DEEP. Where state and town roads meet, DEEP "will notify the Town and CT DOT of the complaint and apportion responsibility between both parties."
- Since January 1, 2024 (PA 23-31), local health departments must keep "electronic reporting systems for homeowners whose wells, or properties, have been damaged by salt contamination."
DEEP warns that investigations "can require significant time, resources, and patience," and it doesn't pay for corroded plumbing; owners seeking damages "will need to file a claim against the identified Responsible Party(ies)." Elsewhere, take the same evidence to your county or state health department: dated reports, raw and treated, and the distance to the road or salt pile. If the fix is a new or deeper well, see grants and state help for well repairs. Labs for the states cited here are on the Connecticut, Vermont, Minnesota and Pennsylvania pages.
Where to go from here
A salty or bitter taste, a well near a salted road, a softener in a house with a low-sodium diet, or a hard-pumped coastal well: each is a reason to order sodium, chloride, sulfate and TDS from a certified lab, in spring or fall, from an untreated and a treated tap. If chloride is high, add lead and copper. If a result touches someone's health, take it to a doctor.
Questions people ask
Is salt in well water dangerous?
How much sodium in well water is too much?
Does a water softener make well water salty?
Can road salt get into a private well?
Is high sulfate well water safe for babies?
Will a filter or softener remove salt or sulfate?
Who pays if road salt contaminated my well?
- U.S. EPA, Drinking Water Advisory: Consumer Acceptability Advice and Health Effects Analysis on Sodium, EPA 822-R-03-006 (February 2003) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- U.S. EPA, Drinking Water Advisory: Consumer Acceptability Advice and Health Effects Analysis on Sulfate, EPA 822-R-03-007 (February 2003) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- U.S. EPA, Contaminant Candidate List Regulatory Determination Support Document for Sulfate, EPA 815-R-03-016 (July 2003) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- U.S. EPA, Regulatory Determination 1 Support Documents: Sodium (last updated June 10, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- U.S. EPA, Regulatory Determination 1 Support Documents: Sulfate (last updated June 10, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- U.S. EPA, 2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories Tables, EPA 822-F-18-001 (March 2018), Drinking Water Advisory Table (accessed 2026-11-03)
- U.S. EPA, Secondary Drinking Water Standards: Guidance for Nuisance Chemicals (last updated May 26, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- U.S. EPA, Protect Your Home's Water (last updated February 26, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Minnesota Department of Health, Sulfate in Well Water (updated August 1, 2025) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Penn State Extension, Water Softening (updated September 8, 2025) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Penn State Extension, Common Drinking Water Problems and Solutions (updated May 29, 2025) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Penn State Extension, Common Water Test Parameters Related to Natural Gas Drilling (updated October 13, 2025) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Sodium (last revised April 22, 2021) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Wisconsin DNR, My Water Tastes Salty (symptom sheet) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- New York State Department of Health, Salt and Drinking Water (Internet Archive copy of the official page, captured October 31, 2025) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- UMass Amherst Center for Agriculture, Food, and the Environment, Sodium Chloride in Private Drinking Water Wells (last updated June 1, 2007; Internet Archive copy of the official page, captured March 11, 2026; live page returned 403) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Connecticut DEEP, Road Salt Frequently Asked Questions (Internet Archive copy of the official page, captured July 9, 2026; live page timed out) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Connecticut DEEP, Potable Water Program: Salt Investigations (content last updated November 5, 2024; Internet Archive copy captured July 9, 2026; live page timed out) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- New Hampshire DES, Road Salt, Corrosivity and Lead (February 9, 2022; Internet Archive copy captured December 8, 2023; live page timed out) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- USGS, Groundwater Chloride Concentrations in Domestic Wells and Proximity to Roadways in Vermont, 2011-2018, Open-File Report 2019-1148 (April 2020) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- USGS, Concentrations of Chloride and Sodium in Groundwater in New Hampshire From 1960 Through 2011, Fact Sheet 2013-3011 (February 2013) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- USGS, Lindsey, Fleming, Goodling and May, Thirty years of regional groundwater-quality trend studies in the United States: Major findings and lessons learned, Journal of Hydrology (2023) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- USGS Water Resources Mission Area, Saltwater Intrusion (accessed 2026-11-03)
- USGS, National Brackish Groundwater Assessment: Sources of Dissolved Solids in Brackish Groundwater (July 22, 2021) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- USGS Circular 1332, Quality of Water from Domestic Wells in Principal Aquifers of the United States, 1991-2004 (DeSimone, Hamilton and Gilliom, 2009) (accessed 2026-11-03)
Find a certified lab
Our state lists do not filter by this test yet. Ask the lab whether it is on its certificate.
Open the lab finder