Private-well owners are on their own for water testing. EPA says private well owners "are responsible for delivering safe drinking water to their households" and advises a test every year for total coliform bacteria, nitrates, total dissolved solids and pH. That test has to be done somewhere. We combined the official state lab certification lists on this site with USGS county data to ask a simple question: how many people who rely on a private well live in a county with no state-certified drinking-water lab inside it?
Why distance matters for one test in particular
Most well tests can travel. A sample for metals or nitrate can usually be mailed. Bacteria are different, because the sample has to reach the lab while any bacteria in it are still alive. The rules and advice differ:
| Who | What it says about bacteria samples | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Vermont Department of Health lab | "this kit must be analyzed within 30 hours of collection" | Lab requirement for its own kits |
| Penn State Extension | "deliver it to the lab within 24 hours" | Extension guidance |
| North Dakota State University Extension | "samples must reach the lab within 36 hours" | Extension guidance |
| Montana State University Well Educated | "There are no hold time requirements for private well samples." Results are more reliable within 30 hours and likely not reliable after 48. | Extension guidance |
| Federal rule for public water systems (40 CFR 141.852) | "The time from sample collection to initiation of test medium incubation may not exceed 30 hours." | Applies to public systems, not private wells |
So a lab in the next county, or a courier that runs on the right days, is often what makes a valid bacteria test possible. A county with no lab is not a county where testing is impossible. It is a county where the owner has to plan around the clock. The full sampling advice is in our guide on how to test well water.
The numbers, state by state
Show the numbers
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Vermont | 70.3 percent of the state's private-well users | |
| Minnesota | 60.5 percent of the state's private-well users | |
| Ohio | 53.9 percent of the state's private-well users | |
| Virginia | 40.3 percent of the state's private-well users | |
| Maine | 27.7 percent of the state's private-well users | |
| Connecticut | 25 percent of the state's private-well users | |
| Pennsylvania | 17.6 percent of the state's private-well users | |
| Wisconsin | 15 percent of the state's private-well users | |
| Washington | 12 percent of the state's private-well users |
New York excluded (our New York list covers PFAS-rebate labs only). Pennsylvania's list is from June 2024. Source: WaterListed analysis of USGS county water use 2015, USGS arsenic estimates (2017) and official state lab lists (method on this page), accessed 2026-11-01.
Vermont has the highest share: 70% of its 243,796 private-well users live in a county with no listed lab, and only 3 of its 14 counties have one. Minnesota follows at 60%, then Ohio at 54% and Virginia at 40%. At the other end, Washington (12%), Wisconsin (15%), Pennsylvania (18%) have a listed lab in the counties where most of their well users live.
In raw numbers the picture shifts toward the populous well states:
Show the numbers
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Ohio | 1,003,575 people (USGS 2015 estimate) | |
| Minnesota | 711,425 people (USGS 2015 estimate) | |
| Virginia | 628,573 people (USGS 2015 estimate) | |
| Pennsylvania | 611,295 people (USGS 2015 estimate) | |
| Wisconsin | 240,191 people (USGS 2015 estimate) | |
| Connecticut | 215,403 people (USGS 2015 estimate) | |
| Maine | 183,091 people (USGS 2015 estimate) | |
| Vermont | 171,368 people (USGS 2015 estimate) | |
| Washington | 123,046 people (USGS 2015 estimate) |
Source: WaterListed analysis of USGS county water use 2015, USGS arsenic estimates (2017) and official state lab lists (method on this page), accessed 2026-11-01.
Ohio has about 1,003,575 private-well users in counties without a listed lab, Minnesota about 711,425 and Virginia about 628,573.
| State | Private-well users (USGS 2015) | In counties with no listed lab | Share | Counties with a listed lab |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maine | 660,497 | 183,091 | 28% | 8 of 16 |
| Vermont | 243,796 | 171,368 | 70% | 3 of 14 |
| Minnesota | 1,176,917 | 711,425 | 60% | 18 of 87 |
| Ohio | 1,861,023 | 1,003,575 | 54% | 33 of 88 |
| Virginia | 1,558,115 | 628,573 | 40% | 45 of 133 |
| Connecticut | 861,472 | 215,403 | 25% | 5 of 8 |
| Pennsylvania (list from June 2024) | 3,470,761 | 611,295 | 18% | 43 of 67 |
| Wisconsin | 1,598,065 | 240,191 | 15% | 55 of 72 |
| Washington | 1,023,853 | 123,046 | 12% | 24 of 39 |
Where the arsenic estimate overlaps
USGS modeled the number of private-well users whose water is likely to exceed EPA's arsenic limit of 10 µg/L, county by county, on a 2010 population base. Vermont's health department puts it plainly: "You cannot see, smell or taste arsenic. Testing is the only way to know if arsenic is in your drinking water." Comparing that estimate with lab locations:
Show the numbers
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Ohio | 120,687 people (USGS model, 2010 base year) | |
| Minnesota | 57,804 people (USGS model, 2010 base year) | |
| Pennsylvania | 24,089 people (USGS model, 2010 base year) | |
| Maine | 23,727 people (USGS model, 2010 base year) | |
| Virginia | 21,849 people (USGS model, 2010 base year) | |
| Connecticut | 18,462 people (USGS model, 2010 base year) | |
| Wisconsin | 12,260 people (USGS model, 2010 base year) | |
| Vermont | 6,728 people (USGS model, 2010 base year) | |
| Washington | 3,056 people (USGS model, 2010 base year) |
USGS describes its arsenic estimates as suitable for broad screening, not as facts about individual wells. Source: WaterListed analysis of USGS county water use 2015, USGS arsenic estimates (2017) and official state lab lists (method on this page), accessed 2026-11-01.
In Ohio, about 120,687 of the estimated 189,191 arsenic-affected well users live in counties with no listed lab, and in Minnesota about 57,804 of 80,354. USGS presents this kind of estimate as useful "for broad screening of the population at risk", so these are planning numbers, not counts of tested wells. Arsenic samples are not limited by the bacteria clock, so a mail-in test is a practical option; see arsenic in well water.
What this means if you live in one of these counties
- Look up your county: counties with at least 1,000 private-well users have a page with their well numbers and any listed labs located there, linked from your state page. The finder shows every lab on your state's list.
- For bacteria, call a lab first and ask about its kit, its holding time and which days it receives samples. Plan collection so the sample arrives in time.
- For arsenic, nitrate, metals, uranium and most other tests, ask whether the lab accepts samples by mail.
- Check whether your state or county runs a testing program: our state pages list the ones we verified.
- Use the which-tests checklist to decide what to order, and the finder to see every certified lab on your state's list, with the tests each one is certified for.
Method and limits
Private-well users are the USGS 2015 county estimate of people on domestic self-supplied water (Dieter and others, 2018). Arsenic figures are the USGS county estimates of domestic-well users with predicted arsenic above 10 µg/L (Ayotte, Medalie and Qi, 2017), on a 2010 population base. Labs are the laboratories on the official state certification lists shown on this site, placed in a county by the address on the list: the ZIP code, using the Census Bureau's 2020 ZCTA-to-county file; where a ZIP spans several counties, the county that contains the lab's town (Census 2020 place and county-subdivision files); where a list gives no ZIP (Maine's), the lab's town. A lab counts for the county it is located in, whichever state's list it appears on.
Limits we know about:
- Lists differ in scope. Some state lists cover only certain tests (Wisconsin's list on this site is its coliform-bacteria labs). New York is left out of the comparison because our New York list covers only labs in its PFAS rebate program. Pennsylvania's list comes from reports printed in June 2024.
- A county line is a rough measure of distance. A lab just across the line may be closer than one in the same county.
- Certified does not mean it takes homeowner samples. Some listed labs serve utilities only. The finder shows the homeowner flag where a state publishes one.
- Different years and methods. The well population (2015) and the arsenic estimate (2010 base) come from different USGS products, so they can disagree for some counties.
- States we have not added yet are not counted. This study covers 9 states. We will update it as lists are added.
The aggregate tables behind this page (by state and by county, counts only, no lab contact details) are not published as downloads. Journalists and researchers can request the data here: say who you are, where the work will appear and which data you need, and we will reply.
Questions people ask
What is a well water testing desert?
How many private-well users live in a county without a certified lab?
Which state has the highest share?
Can I still test my well if there is no lab in my county?
Can I use this data?
- U.S. EPA, Private Drinking Water Wells (accessed 2026-11-01)
- U.S. EPA, Protect Your Home's Water (last updated Feb 26, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-01)
- USGS, Estimated use of water in the United States, county-level data for 2015 (Dieter and others, ver. 2.0, 2018) (accessed 2026-11-01)
- USGS, Estimated county level domestic well population with arsenic greater than 10 micrograms per liter (Ayotte, Medalie and Qi, 2017) (accessed 2026-11-01)
- U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 ZCTA to county relationship file (accessed 2026-11-01)
- 40 CFR 141.852, analytical methods and holding time (public water systems) (accessed 2026-11-01)
- Montana State University Well Educated, bacteria retesting (accessed 2026-11-01)
- Vermont Department of Health Laboratory, Drinking Water Sampling Instructions (bacteria kit: analyzed within 30 hours) (accessed 2026-11-01)
- Penn State Extension, Testing Your Drinking Water (accessed 2026-11-01)
- NDSU Extension, Drinking Water Quality: Testing and Interpreting Your Results (accessed 2026-11-01)
- Vermont Department of Health, Arsenic in Drinking Water (accessed 2026-11-01)
- U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 place-by-county and county subdivision reference files (accessed 2026-11-01)